Allen E. Paulson College of Science & Technology

Pre-Tenure Review
Effective Fall 2006

        I.       

Name

Eagle ID#

 

 

First  Middle  Last   Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years at Institution

Probationary Credit Granted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      II.       

Summary of the section of Pre-Tenure Review Committee (s) and/or chair’s recommendations submitted at the various levels within the institution pertaining to this individual’s pre-tenure review.

 

 

Brief statement indicating the review and recommendation at the departmental level, the department chair’s     recommendation, and the dean’s recommendation.  Do not include numerical votes.

 

 

 

 

A.  At the departmental/school level:

_______________________________________________

 

Signature of Unit Head/Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

B. At the college level:               

________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

Signature of Dean/Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY

 

Pre-Tenure Recommendation for:

 

 

    III.    

Brief description of the academic accomplishments of the faculty member.

Instructions for narrative (see §205.01 & 209, Faculty Handbook):

·         Formal, third-person address; write out all acronyms first time used.

·         Introductory paragraph: (1) length of service.

·         Discussion of teaching: (1) demonstrated record of superior, effective teaching defined as reflective, student-centered, respectful of the diversity of students, adapted to various learning styles, and focused on student learning outcomes; (2) reaching activities include teaching in classroom, lab, or studio; direction of research; fulfillment of professional librarian responsibilities; mentoring; and development of new courses, programs, online courses, and other curricular materials; and (3) judgments based on examination of course syllabi and other course materials, peer evaluations, critical review and dissemination of teaching products, performance of students in subsequent venues, follow-up graduates in graduate school or in employment, and student ratings of instruction.

·         Discussion of scholarship/creativity: (1) discussion of significance of scholarly accomplishments within the discipline; and (2) scholarship activities include peer-reviewed work, conference presentations, exhibitions, performances, or professional accomplishments.

·         Discussion of service (institution and profession):  (1) service activities include application of one’s expertise in the discipline for the benefit of a professional organization, the community, or the institution; academic advisement; work in schools, businesses, museums, social agencies, government, manuscript reviewing, and design and development of professional conferences.

Closing paragraph: (1) needs of the institution; and (2) ability of candidate to function within the Georgia Southern academic community.

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________

 

Signature of Unit Head/Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY

 

 

 

Pre-Tenure Recommendation for

 

 

 

 

IIIb.      Brief description of the academic accomplishments of the faculty member.

Instructions for narrative (see §205.01 & 209, Faculty Handbook):

·         Formal, third-person address; write out all acronyms first time used.

·         Introductory paragraph: (1) length of service.

·         Discussion of teaching: (1) demonstrated record of superior, effective teaching defined as reflective, student-centered, respectful of the diversity of students, adapted to various learning styles, and focused on student learning outcomes; (2) reaching activities include teaching in classroom, lab, or studio; direction of research; fulfillment of professional librarian responsibilities; mentoring; and development of new courses, programs, online courses, and other curricular materials; and (3) judgments based on examination of course syllabi and other course materials, peer evaluations, critical review and dissemination of teaching products, performance of students in subsequent venues, follow-up graduates in graduate school or in employment, and student ratings of instruction.

·         Discussion of scholarship/creativity: (1) discussion of significance of scholarly accomplishments within the discipline; and (2) scholarship activities include peer-reviewed work, conference presentations, exhibitions, performances, or professional accomplishments.

·         Discussion of service (institution and profession):  (1) service activities include application of one’s expertise in the discipline for the benefit of a professional organization, the community, or the institution; academic advisement; work in schools, businesses, museums, social agencies, government, manuscript reviewing, and design and development of professional conferences.

Closing paragraph: (1) needs of the institution; and (2) ability of candidate to function within the Georgia Southern academic community.

 

 

____________________________________________________

Signature of Dean/Date