Allen E. Paulson College of Science & Technology

Post-Tenure Review
Effective Fall 2006

        I.  

Name


Eagle ID#


 

 

First  Middle  Last   Other

 

 

Rank

 

 

 

 

 

Years at Georgia Southern



_

 

 

 

Years in present rank at Georgia Southern


 

 

 

 

Years since last faculty (tenure, promotion, post-tenure) review:


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      II.       

Summary of Post-Tenure Review Committee (s) and/or the recommendations submitted at the department and college level pertaining to this individual’s post-tenure review.

 

 

Brief statement indicating the review and recommendation at the departmental level, the department chair’s     recommendation, review and recommendation at the college level, and the dean’s recommendation.  Do not include numerical votes.

 

 

 

 

A.  At the departmental/school level:

_______________________________________________

 

Signature of Unit Head/Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

B. At the college level:               

________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

Signature of Dean/Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY

 

 

Post-Tenure Recommendation for


 

 

    III.    

Brief description of the academic accomplishments of the faculty member.

Instructions for narrative (see §205.01 & 209, Faculty Handbook):

a.       Formal, third-person address; write out all acronyms first time used.

b.       Introductory paragraph: (1) length of service.

c.       Discussion of teaching: (1) demonstrated record of superior, effective teaching defined as reflective, student-centered, respectful of the diversity of students, adapted to various learning styles, and focused on student learning outcomes; (2) reaching activities include teaching in classroom, lab, or studio; direction of research; fulfillment of professional librarian responsibilities; mentoring; and development of new courses, programs, online courses, and other curricular materials; and (3) judgments based on examination of course syllabi and other course materials, peer evaluations, critical review and dissemination of teaching products, performance of students in subsequent venues, follow-up graduates in graduate school or in employment, and student ratings of instruction.

d.       Discussion of scholarship/creativity: (1) discussion of significance of scholarly accomplishments within the discipline; and (2) scholarship activities include peer-reviewed work, conference presentations, exhibitions, performances, or professional accomplishments.

e.       Discussion of service (institution and profession):  (1) service activities include application of one’s expertise in the discipline for the benefit of a professional organization, the community, or the institution; academic advisement; work in schools, businesses, museums, social agencies, government, manuscript reviewing, and design and development of professional conferences.

Closing paragraph: (1) needs of the institution; and (2) ability of candidate to function within the Georgia Southern academic community.

 

 

Please rate the performance of this faculty member:

 

Meritorious

Satisfactory 

Unsatisfactory

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________

 

Signature of Unit Head/Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY

 

 

 

Post-Tenure Recommendation for


 

 

 

 

IIIb.      Brief description of the academic accomplishments of the faculty member.

Instructions for narrative (see §205.01 & 209, Faculty Handbook):

·         Formal, third-person address; write out all acronyms first time used.

·         Introductory paragraph: (1) length of service.

·         Discussion of teaching: (1) demonstrated record of superior, effective teaching defined as reflective, student-centered, respectful of the diversity of students, adapted to various learning styles, and focused on student learning outcomes; (2) reaching activities include teaching in classroom, lab, or studio; direction of research; fulfillment of professional librarian responsibilities; mentoring; and development of new courses, programs, online courses, and other curricular materials; and (3) judgments based on examination of course syllabi and other course materials, peer evaluations, critical review and dissemination of teaching products, performance of students in subsequent venues, follow-up graduates in graduate school or in employment, and student ratings of instruction.

·         Discussion of scholarship/creativity: (1) discussion of significance of scholarly accomplishments within the discipline; and (2) scholarship activities include peer-reviewed work, conference presentations, exhibitions, performances, or professional accomplishments.

·         Discussion of service (institution and profession):  (1) service activities include application of one’s expertise in the discipline for the benefit of a professional organization, the community, or the institution; academic advisement; work in schools, businesses, museums, social agencies, government, manuscript reviewing, and design and development of professional conferences.

Closing paragraph: (1) needs of the institution; and (2) ability of candidate to function within the Georgia Southern academic community.

 

 

____________________________________________________

Signature of Dean/Date